ArticleTherapeutics and clinical risk management2025
A Retrospective Machine Learning Analysis to Predict 3-Month Nonunion of Unstable Distal Clavicle Fracture Patients Treated with Open Reduction and Internal Fixation.
Article in Therapeutics and clinical risk management, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This retrospective study aims to predict the risk of 3-month nonunion in patients with unstable distal clavicle fractures (UDCFs) treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) using machine learning (ML) methods. ML was chosen over traditional statistical approaches because of its superior ability to capture complex nonlinear interactions and to handle imbalanced datasets. Methods: We collected UDCFs patients at Nanjing Luhe People's Hospital (China) between January 2015 and May 2023. The unfavorable outcome was defined as 3-month nonunion, as represented by disappeared fracture line and continuous callus. Patients meeting inclusion criteria were randomly divided into training (70%) and testing (30%) sets. Five ML models (logistic regression, random forest classifier, extreme gradient boosting, multi-layer perceptron, and category boosting) were developed. Those models were selected based on univariate analysis and refined using the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO). Model performance was evaluated using AUROC, AUPRC, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F1 score, and calibration curves. Results: A total of 248 patients were finally included into this study, and 76 (30.6%) of them had unfavorable outcomes. While all five models showed similar trends, the CatBoost model achieved the highest performance (AUROC = 0.863, AUPRC = 0.801) with consistent identification of the risk factors mentioned above. The SHAP values identified the CCD as the significant predictor for assessing the risk of 3-month nonunion in patients with UDCFs within the Chinese demographic. Conclusion: The refined model incorporated four readily accessible variables, wherein the CCD, HDL levels, and blood loss were associated with an elevated risk of nonunion. Conversely, the application of nerve blocks, including postoperative block, was correlated with a reduced risk. Our results suggest that ML, particularly the CatBoost model, can be integrated into clinical workflows to aid surgeons in optimizing intraoperative techniques and postoperative management to reduce nonunion rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.