Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40352654›Full record

ArticleGMS hygiene and infection control2025

Optimizing oropharyngeal swabbing techniques: the relationship between force applied and SARS-CoV-2 detection sensitivity.

Peter Melcher, Corinna Pietsch, Sandra Bergs, Yasmin Youssef, Paul Rahden, Pierre Hepp, Ralf Henkelmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GMS hygiene and infection control, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Peter MelcherDepartment of Orthopedics, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Corinna PietschInstitute of Medical Microbiology and Virology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Sandra BergsInstitute of Medical Microbiology and Virology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Yasmin YoussefDepartment of Orthopedics, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Paul RahdenDepartment of Implementation Research, Bernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine, Hamburg, Germany.
Pierre HeppDepartment of Orthopedics, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Ralf HenkelmannDepartment of Orthopedics, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: Nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs are essential for diagnosing SARS-CoV-2 infections, with nucleic acid testing (NAT) being the most sensitive method. However, NAT results are heavily influenced by preanalytical factors, including quality of the sample. This study examines the effect of applied force during oropharyngeal sampling on sample quality, specifically assessing cell count and the associated NAT cycle threshold (Ct) values. Methods: A three-phase investigation was conducted to explore the relationship between sampling force and cell quantity, as well as the impact of cell count on NAT sensitivity. Results: A significantly lower Ct value was achieved by artificially increasing the cell count in a swab sample and applying a greater force resulted in higher cell counts, but the opposite effect on Ct values of SARS-CoV-2 NAT was shown. Conclusion: These findings indicate that while applying greater force during sample collection increases the number of collected cells, it does not improve the sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 detection and can even lead to poorer results. Further research should focus on optimizing swab design to improve sample quality and the number of cells obtained.

Indexed as

cell countNAToropharyngeal swabpreanalytical factorssample forceSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID40352654
PMCPMC12060361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.