Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40352637›Full record

ReviewGlobal challenges (Hoboken, NJ)2025

Marketing Strategies in Nanomaterials for Sensor Applications: Bridging Lab to Market.

Anoop Singh, Eliyash Ahmed, Mehrajud Din Rather, Atchaya Sundararajan, Alka Sharma, Farah S Choudhary, Ashok K Sundramoorthy, Saurav Dixit, Nikolai Ivanovich Vatin, Sandeep Arya

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Global challenges (Hoboken, NJ), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Anoop SinghDepartment of Physics Govt. Women Degree College Gandhinagar Higher Education Department Jammu Jammu & Kashmir 180004 India.
Eliyash AhmedDepartment of Physics (H&S) Guru Nanak Institutions Technical Campus Hyderabad 501506 India.
Mehrajud Din RatherDepartment of Physics University Institute of Engineering and Technology Guru Nanak University Ibrahimpatnam Telangana 501506 India.
Atchaya SundararajanDepartment of Physics School of Electrical and Electronics Engineering (SEEE) SASTRA Deemed University Thanjavur 613401 India.
Alka SharmaThe Business School University of Jammu Jammu Jammu and Kashmir 180006 India.
Farah S ChoudharyThe Business School University of Jammu Jammu Jammu and Kashmir 180006 India.
Ashok K SundramoorthyCentre for Nano-Biosensors Department of Prosthodontics Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals Poonamallee High Road, Velappanchavadi Chennai Tamil Nadu 600077 India.
Saurav DixitCentre of Research Impact and Outcome Chitkara University Rajpura Punjab 140417 India.
Nikolai Ivanovich VatinPeter the Great St Petersburg Polytechnic University Russian Federation St. Petersburg 195251 Russia.
Sandeep AryaDepartment of Physics University of Jammu Jammu Jammu and Kashmir 180006 India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5059-0609

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nanomaterials have revolutionized sensor technology by offering enhanced sensitivity, selectivity, and miniaturization capabilities. However, the commercialization of nanomaterial-based sensors remains challenging due to the complexities involved in bridging laboratory innovations to market-ready products. This review article explores the various marketing strategies that can facilitate the successful commercialization of nanomaterials for sensor applications. It emphasizes the importance of understanding market needs, regulatory landscapes, and the value proposition of nanomaterials over traditional materials. The study also highlights the role of strategic partnerships, intellectual property management, and customer education in overcoming market entry barriers. Through a comprehensive analysis of case studies and industry practices, this review provides a framework for companies and researchers to effectively transition from lab-scale innovations to commercially viable sensor products. The findings suggest that a well-rounded marketing strategy, combined with robust product development and stakeholder engagement, is crucial for capitalizing on the unique benefits of nanomaterials in sensor applications.

Indexed as

commercialization processintellectual propertynanomaterialssensortechnology transfer

Identifiers

PMID40352637
PMCPMC12065100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.