ArticlePalliative care and social practice2025
Developing a values-based interorganisational Care at the End-of-Life Collaborative framework for the Australian context: A mixed-methods, practice-based research protocol.
Article in Palliative care and social practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: As the population ages and the demand for quality care at the end of life increases, health costs are increasing, thus creating a perfect storm of need, outstripping the supply of palliative care services. Engaging communities to support care at the end of life through the establishment of values-based interorganisational Care at the End-of-Life Collaboratives is one approach to addressing this problem. Whilst there is an abundance of literature about collaboratives, understanding of those supporting care at the end of life is lacking. Objectives: The objectives of this research are to understand the contextual factors using an evaluation framework that support the success of values-based interorganisational Care at the End-of-Life Collaboratives to achieve system improvements at a regional level and develop a framework for establishing sustainable Care at the End-of-Life Collaboratives in jurisdictions across Australia. Design: This is a two-phase study that uses a mixed-methods case study and a Delphi methodology. Methods and analysis: Phase I data collection is based on the RE-AIM framework, which uses the Partnership Self-Assessment Tool (PSAT) and semi-structured interviews with Collaborative members and key stakeholders. A review of collaborative documentation, including meeting minutes and reports, will also be completed. Phase II will include a minimum of two surveys of the expert group recruited from the peak palliative care bodies across Australia. Quantitative data in this study will be analysed using descriptive statistics and frequency distributions. A reflexive approach to content analysis of qualitative data will be adopted. Ethics: This research is approved by the University of Southern Queensland Human Research Ethics Committee (approval ETH2023-0718). Discussion: Understanding the contextual factors that contribute to the sustainability of an existing Care at the End-of-Life Collaborative within Australia will enable the foundation of a framework for developing similar collaboratives, for refinement through expert consensus using Delphi methodology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.