Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40352555›Full record

ArticleACS omega2025

AlloBench: A Data Set Pipeline for the Development and Benchmarking of Allosteric Site Prediction Tools.

Dibyajyoti Maity, Baofu Qiao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Dibyajyoti MaityDepartment of Natural Sciences, Baruch College, City University of New York, New York 10010, New York United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8032-646X
Baofu QiaoDepartment of Natural Sciences, Baruch College, City University of New York, New York 10010, New York United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8870-5985

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Allostery refers to the activity regulation of biological macromolecules originating from the binding of an effector molecule at the allosteric site that is distant from the active site. The few existing allosteric data sets have not been updated with recent discoveries of allosteric proteins and are challenging to use for data-intensive tasks. Instead of providing another data set bound to become outdated, we present the AlloBench pipeline to create high-quality data sets of biomolecules with allosteric and active site information suitable for computational and data-driven studies of protein allostery. The pipeline produces a data set of 2141 allosteric sites from 2034 protein structures with 418 unique protein chains by integrating information from AlloSteric Database, UniProt, Mechanism and Catalytic Site Atlas, and Protein Data Bank. Furthermore, we use a subset of 100 proteins from the AlloBench data set to quantitatively compare the performance of currently available allosteric site prediction tools: APOP, PASSer, Ohm, ALLO, Allosite, STRESS, and AlloPred. Such a large-scale benchmarking of these programs has not been undertaken on a common test set. The results show a significant need for improvement, as the accuracy for all programs is well below 60%, with PASSer (Ensemble) outperforming the rest. The AlloBench pipeline will not only promote the development of improved allosteric site prediction tools but also serve as a reference for studying allostery in general.

Identifiers

PMID40352555
PMCPMC12059942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.