Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40352544›Full record

ArticleACS omega2025

Antimicrobial Packaging from Potato Starch and Pectin with Citric Acid and Bioactive Compounds from Cashew Apple: Preparation, Characterization, and Application in Bread.

Janaína de Moura Fernandes, Cristiani Viegas Brandão Grisi, Rita de Cassia Andrade da Silva, Érica da Costa Monção, Géssica Alexandre de Barros, Sanierlly da Paz do Nascimento, Janeeyre Ferreira Maciel, Angela Maria Tribuzy de Magalhães Cordeiro, Neide Queiroz, Antônia Lucia Souza

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Novel Active Films with Semolina and Jatoba (Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Janaína de Moura FernandesPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos, Universidade Federal da Paraíba, João Pessoa, Paraiba 58050-085, Brazil.
Cristiani Viegas Brandão GrisiPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Química, Departamento de Química, Universidade Federal da Paraíba, João Pessoa, Paraiba 58050-085, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3365-1814
Rita de Cassia Andrade da SilvaPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Química, Departamento de Química, Universidade Federal da Paraíba, João Pessoa, Paraiba 58050-085, Brazil.
Érica da Costa MonçãoPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos, Universidade Federal da Paraíba, João Pessoa, Paraiba 58050-085, Brazil.
Géssica Alexandre de BarrosDepartamento de Engenharia de Alimentos, Universidade Federal da Paraíba, João Pessoa, Paraiba 58050-085, Brazil.
Sanierlly da Paz do NascimentoPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Química, Departamento de Química, Universidade Federal da Paraíba, João Pessoa, Paraiba 58050-085, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7010-0865
Janeeyre Ferreira MacielDepartamento de Engenharia de Alimentos, Universidade Federal da Paraíba, João Pessoa, Paraiba 58050-085, Brazil.
Angela Maria Tribuzy de Magalhães CordeiroDepartamento de Tecnologia de Alimentos, Universidade Federal da Paraíba, João Pessoa, Paraiba 58050-085, Brazil.
Neide QueirozPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Química, Departamento de Química, Universidade Federal da Paraíba, João Pessoa, Paraiba 58050-085, Brazil.
Antônia Lucia SouzaPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos, Universidade Federal da Paraíba, João Pessoa, Paraiba 58050-085, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0670-8379

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to develop and characterize active antimicrobial films composed of potato starch and pectin, by incorporating inverted sugar as a plasticizer and bioactive compounds from cashew (CC) and citric acid (CA) as additives for application in bread packaging. Five treatments were formulated by the solution casting method: F0 (without CC-0.5% CA), F1 (1% CC-0.25% CA), F3 (3% CC-0.5% CA), F6 (6% CC-1% CA), and C1 (without CC and CA). Two other controls were used in the bread application (C2: low-density polyethylene and C3: unpackaged bread). Treatments with additives exhibited an increased water vapor permeability compared to C1; F6 showed the highest value (7.62 × 10

Identifiers

PMID40352544
PMCPMC12059889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.