ArticleACS omega2025
Study on Particle-Bubble Interaction and Separation in Fluidized-Bed Flotation.
Article in ACS omega, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Experimental Characterization of the Hydrodynamic Interactions between a Freely Rising Bubble and a Settling Particle.Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fluidized-bed flotation can realize effective recovery of coarse minerals. In this study, 1-2 mm lignite was used as the experimental material. First, the interaction between the particle and bubble was investigated to reveal the mechanism of fluidized-bed flotation. The rising water flow makes the particle settling velocity decrease, leading to an increase in the particle-bubble contact time. The application of methyl oleate as a collector for coal leads to a significant reduction in the induction time and an increase in the critical detachment force. Both these conditions contribute to the formation of particle-bubble aggregation, indicating that the decrease in settling velocity and the enhancement of hydrophobicity are significant for the recovery of coarse coal. Subsequently, a comparative analysis of separation efficiency between column flotation and fluidized-bed flotation was performed alongside an investigation into the optimal parameters of fluidized-bed flotation. The clean coal yield of fluidized-bed flotation is more than 30%, while that of column flotation is less than 10%. The combination of fluidized-bed flotation and a methyl oleate collector demonstrates a capacity for efficient recovery of coarse coal particles. When the methyl oleate dosage is 2000 g/t and the superficial water velocity is 87 mm/s, the fluidized-bed flotation achieves the optimum separation effect, with a clean coal yield of 32.71% and an ash content of 9.89%.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.