ReviewACS omega2025
Dynamics and Impacts of Microplastics (MPs) and Nanoplastics (NPs) on Ecosystems and Biogeochemical Processes: The Need for Robust Regulatory Frameworks.
Review in ACS omega, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Systematic optimization and characterization of bacterial depolymerization of poly(ethylene terephthalate) plastics.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Waste-to-sensor upcycling of polyethylene terephthalate over Ag/Zr-MOF photocatalyst for microplastic degradation and AI-assisted heavy metal detection.Journal of biological engineering · 2026Article
- Article
- Rhizosphere microbiome engineering with PGPR to combat soil-mediated climate change.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
- Educating for environmental transition: the summer school on microplastics.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2026Article
- Harmfulness Score: A Data-Driven Framework for Ranking Environmental Risks of Microplastics.Macromolecular rapid communications · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microplastics (MPs) and nanoplastics (NPs) pose significant threats to aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems, disrupting nutrient cycling, altering soil properties, and affecting microbial communities. MPs and NPs bioaccumulate and contribute to global nutrient and water cycle disruptions, intensifying the impact of climate change. Despite the widespread use of plastics, inadequate plastic waste management leads to persistent environmental pollution. Toxic compounds are transported by MPs and NPs, affecting food chains, nutrient cycles, and overall ecosystem health. MPs impact soil biogeochemistry, microbial activity, and greenhouse gas emissions by altering the nitrogen and carbon cycles. One of the largest gaps in microplastic (MP) research today is the lack of standardized sampling and analytical methods. This lack of standardization significantly complicates the comparison of results across different studies. Multidisciplinary research and strict regulatory measures are needed to address MP pollution. This review highlights the critical need for mitigation methods to maintain ecosystem integrity and suggests standardization of sampling and data analysis. It offers insights into MP distribution, best practices for data analysis, and the impacts and interactions of MPs with biogeochemical processes. The Environmental Protection Agency has identified a critical need to improve the identification of nanoplastics. Particles smaller than 10 μm become increasingly difficult to quantify using standard MP detection practices.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.