ReviewACS omega2025
Recent Advances in Therapeutic Peptides: Innovations and Applications in Treating Infections and Diseases.
Review in ACS omega, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reprogramming RiPP scaffolds through skeletal editing unlocks chemical space.Chemical science · 2026Article
- SA-MTP: a structure-aware framework for multifunctional therapeutic peptide annotation.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Self-Assembling Short Peptide Carriers for Gene Delivery.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Peptides and Amino Acids in Drug Development: Where We Stand and Where We Must Go.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Natural and Synthetic Peptides as Alternatives to Antibiotics in Intestinal Infections-A Review.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Antimicrobial Peptides Against Antimicrobial-Resistant Bacteria: Focus on Machine Learning.Infection and drug resistance · 2026Review
- Graphene-based nanomaterials: mechanisms and potentials in the fight against multidrug resistant bacterial infections: a review.RSC advances · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Peptides have become a powerful frontier in modern medicine, offering a promising therapeutic solution for various diseases and advancing rapidly in pharmaceutical development. These small amino acid chains, with their innovative design, have attracted significant attention due to their versatility and high receptor specificity, which minimizes off-target effects, along with enhanced therapeutic efficacy, biodegradability, low toxicity, and minimal immunogenicity. They are being explored for use in several clinical domains, like metabolic diseases, immunomodulation, and cancer. Furthermore, antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) have grown to be a promising strategy to combat the worldwide challenge of antibiotic resistance, demonstrating promising results against multidrug-resistant organisms. Both natural and engineered peptides have been discovered and investigated, whereas numerous others are progressing toward clinical trials in a number of therapeutic domains. Recent improvements with surface modification, such as peptide engineering, peptide cyclization, PEGylation, and the utilization of synthetic amino acids to enhance their pharmacokinetic profiles and overcome the inherent disadvantages of these peptides have made it possible for the area to continue to advance. Moreover, their therapeutic potential has been further enhanced by innovative delivery methods, such as self-assembling peptides, nanocarriers, and alternate routes of administration. This Review critically states the potential of peptides as versatile therapeutics along with their modifications and advancements to drive the significant progress to treat infections and chronic diseases, along with their potential benefits and challenges.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.