ArticleJournal of reproduction & infertility
Impact of Time-Lapse Incubator Systems on Fertilization, Blastocyst Development, and Clinical Pregnancy Outcomes.
Article in Journal of reproduction & infertility. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The use of the time-lapse (TL) technology in infertility treatment centers has expanded, and the findings indicate its positive effect on embryo development, selection and increased pregnancy success rates. The purpose of the current study was to compare TL culture system and conventional incubator (CI) on IVF outcomes. Methods: A total of 4,769 infertile couples undergoing IVF programs were enrolled in the study. The participants were categorized into two groups according to the embryo culture system, with 2,184 patients assigned to TL incubator and 2,585 to CI group. The outcomes measured included fertilization rate, proportion of top-quality embryos on day 3 and 5, and clinical pregnancy rate. Statistical analyses were conducted utilizing the Mann-Whitney U test and chi-square test. A p<0.05 indicated significance. Results: This study revealed significantly higher fertilization rates and top-quality blastocysts in the TL group in comparison to CI group (p<0.001). Despite these differences, a comparable clinical pregnancy rate was observed between the two culture systems, with rates of 45.7% for TL and 41.1% for CI (p=0.169). These findings remained consistent in the good prognosis group, but not in the poor prognosis group. In the poor prognosis group, the TL culture system significantly improved fertilization rates (p<0.001), while the rates of top-quality cleavage and blastocyst formation were comparable between the two systems (p=0.075). Conclusion: Based on the findings of the study, time-lapse culture system demonstrated superior performance compared to the conventional incubator system in generating top-quality blastocysts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.