ArticleJournal of reproduction & infertility
Cytogenetic Evaluation and Clinical Correlation: A Retrospective Analysis of East Indian Patients with Diverse Amenorrhea Profiles.
Article in Journal of reproduction & infertility. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Amenorrhea is defined as the absence of menstruation in women at reproductive age, caused by imbalanced hormonal interactions. The genes located on X chromosome are linked to the physiology of menstruation and reproduction. Early detection of major chromosomal conditions can be facilitated through karyotyping. The purpose of the current study was to identify and establish the frequency and spectrum of chromosomal anomalies in amenorrhea patients of Eastern Indian population, and to correlate their clinical features with cytogenetic findings. Methods: From September 2022 to September 2024, 231 women with confirmed amenorrhea were included in the study conducted at inDNA Life Sciences, India. Clinical features of women with amenorrhea were recorded and cytogenetic investigation was carried. Results: It was revealed that 20.35% of amenorrhea cases exhibited chromosomal anomalies. Among them, 38.30% were classified as numerical anomalies, 25.53% as sex reversal, 19.15% as structural anomalies, and 17.02% as mosaic karyotypes, with X-monosomy identified as the most prevalent anomaly. Conclusion: The findings emphasize the importance of karyotyping in diagnosis, highlighting its role in early detection and management of female infertility. Karyo-typing has a resolution limit of 4-5 Mb, which disables identification of submicroscopic chromosomal abnormalities. In contrast, chromosomal microarray (CMA) analysis can examine the entire genome at higher resolutions, allowing for the identification of genetic abnormalities that may not be detected by karyotyping. While CMA was excluded from this investigation, it could serve as a valuable technique for future research aimed at identifying submicroscopic chromosomal abnormalities in cytogenetically normal women with amenorrhea.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.