ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2025
Transcranial direct current stimulation in individuals with severe traumatic brain injury in the subacute phase: a case series.
Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study is to report clinical cases of patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) who underwent transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in the subacute phase. We hypothesize that tDCS will improve the functional and cognitive recovery of patients. 5 men, admitted with severe TBI, and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score ≤ 8 on admission or at some point during hospitalization, were in the subacute phase of the trauma (between 2 and 16 weeks). Participants received 5 sessions of tDCS every day. The results were measured at the beginning and at the end of the 5 sessions. The application of tDCS with an active electrode (anode) was applied to the region of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (LPFC - F3) and the cathode was positioned over the contralateral supraorbital area. Clinical outcomes were measured through cognitive assessment, Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE), mental health and depression, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-A), pain, visual analogue scale (VAS), Functional Independence Measure (FIM), Rancho Los Amigos Scale (RLAS) and Glasgow Outcome Scale - Extended (GOS-E), were applied to classify the patient's condition. For characteristics of participants and findings results, descriptive statistics were presented as mean ± Standard Deviation (SD). The results after the tDCS intervention show substantial improvement in the assessed. The research demonstrates the potential benefits of using tDCS in patients with TBI, but also provides a practical basis for applying these techniques in clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.