ArticleInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease2025
Construction and Validation of an Early Warning Model for Predicting the 28-Day Mortality in Sepsis Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.
Article in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- 28-Day Mortality and Prognostic Factors in COPD Patients with Sepsis: A Retrospective Study Using eICU-CRD Database.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2026Article
- Development of a nomogram to predict 30-day mortality in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease complicated by sepsis: insights from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC-IV) database.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In the intensive care unit (ICU), approximately 45.6% of patients diagnosed with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) also presented with sepsis, and this cohort exhibited a significantly higher 28-day mortality rate compared to sepsis patients without COPD (23.6% versus 16.4%). A novel nomogram is necessary to predict the risk of mortality within 28 days for sepsis patients with COPD. Methods: Clinical data from 501 sepsis patients with COPD were sourced from the MIMIC-IV database. These data were randomly allocated into a training cohort and a validation cohort in a 3:1 ratio. Independent predictors of 28-day mortality were identified through both univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. Subsequently, a nomogram model was developed, and its performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, calibration plots, and decision curve analysis. Results: The 28-day mortality rates in the training and validation cohorts were 32.7% and 27.2%, respectively. Multivariate regression analysis identified age, heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine (Cr), lactate levels, pH, and urine output as independent risk factors for 28-day mortality in sepsis patients with COPD. Furthermore, the nomogram demonstrated superior predictive performance, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.784 for the training group and 0.689 for the validation group. Conclusion: This nomogram integrates laboratory indicators pertinent to the patient's metabolic status, hypoxia status, and organ function, thereby enhancing the accuracy of early prediction of 28-day mortality in sepsis patients with COPD. Additionally, the model's comparative advantage over existing scoring systems (eg, SOFA) would enhance its impact. Our findings hold substantial implications for early prognostic assessment and clinical decision-making in this patient population. Therefore, earlier diagnosis within 24 hours of admission and proper identification of high-risk patients may reduce disease-related mortality by promoting timely treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.