ArticleSaudi journal of medicine & medical sciences
Clinical-year Students' Competency in Chest X-ray Interpretation: A Theoretical-based Intervention.
Article in Saudi journal of medicine & medical sciences. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Acceptance and use of GenAI among medical and health sciences students in Saudi Arabia: an extended TAM study.BMC medical education · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Chest radiography is important in detecting chest abnormalities, an essential skill for medical students during their transition into clinical years. Although critical, limited research has evaluated students' competencies in chest X-ray interpretation, a recognized area of weakness. Objectives: This study aims to (1) assess medical students' competencies and confidence in chest X-ray interpretation, (2) measure the effectiveness of an educational intervention, and (3) determine the influence of clinical history on students' decision-making. Materials and Methods: This experimental pre- and post-design study included clinical-year students from College of Medicine, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia, and was conducted between November 2022 and April 2023. It was executed in three phases: pre-intervention assessment, an intervention involving a lecture based on Thomas and Kern's six-step approach, and a post-intervention assessment. Results: The study comprised 77 students. Mean self-reported knowledge and confidence scores were 3.08 ± 0.6 and 2.78 ± 0.7, respectively. There was a significant difference in the mean scores for the pre-test without clinical history (6.29 ± 2.38) compared with the pre-test with clinical history scores (8.58 ± 2.65) ( Conclusions: A lecture-based intervention built on Thomas and Kern's approach markedly enhanced students' capacities to interpret chest X-rays. Integrating clinical history proved beneficial, underscoring the necessity for comprehensive teaching methodologies in medical education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.