ArticleMedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources2025
Dilation and Evacuation Simulation Model for Learners and Providers Who Offer Abortion Care.
Article in MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: In the US, one in four women will have an abortion, and most OB/GYN physicians have had patients who required abortion care. Most second-trimester abortions in the US (95%) are performed via dilation and evacuation (D&E), which requires provider skill and competency. Barriers to obtaining abortion training include opt-in residency programs, location-based legal restrictions, and religiously affiliated institutions. Our D&E simulation is a cost-effective, realistic model. Methods: D&E models were assembled using juice containers, Cornish hens, and Sopher forceps. Thirty-five participants (medical students and OB/GYN residents) completed presimulation surveys and received a brief lecture about abortion demographics, techniques, and complications, followed by the hands-on simulation; 27 completed postsimulation surveys. Participants assessed their comfort levels in performing D&Es and recognizing postabortion complications, and their likelihood of performing D&Es in future clinical practice. Results: Comfort levels significantly improved pre- to postsimulation, increasing from 32% to 55% ( Discussion: Our affordable and simple D&E model can be easily replicated and implemented for training in second-trimester D&E. This model can serve as a valuable and realistic tool for providers with restricted access to clinical abortion who need adjunct training, improving physician education and competency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.