Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40352328›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in digital health2025

Technology-enhanced practice competencies: scoping review and novel model development.

Jonathan G Perle, Dilip N Chandran, Emily Brezler, Michelle Coleman, Julia Deziel, Patrick Nahhas, Gabrielle McDonald, Jason F Jent

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jonathan G PerleDepartment of Behavioral Medicine and Psychiatry, Rockefeller Neuroscience Institute, West Virginia University School of Medicine, Morgantown, WV, United States.
Dilip N ChandranDepartment of Behavioral Medicine and Psychiatry, Rockefeller Neuroscience Institute, West Virginia University School of Medicine, Morgantown, WV, United States.
Emily BrezlerDepartment of Internal Medicine and Pediatrics, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY, United States.
Michelle ColemanWest Virginia University School of Medicine, Morgantown, WV, United States.
Julia DezielWest Virginia University School of Medicine, Morgantown, WV, United States.
Patrick NahhasWest Virginia University School of Medicine, Morgantown, WV, United States.
Gabrielle McDonaldDepartment of Behavioral Medicine and Psychiatry, West Virginia University School of Medicine, Morgantown, WV, United States.
Jason F JentDepartment of Pediatrics, Leonard M. Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: With technology routinely integrated into healthcare, it is essential that practitioners obtain skills in the numerous competencies required. Unfortunately, literature to guide use remains inconsistent and fragmented. The current scoping review identified technology-enhanced practice competencies for healthcare practitioners among peer-reviewed literature. Methods: A review of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, PsycInfo, Global Index Medicus, and Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science was conducted between November 2022 and March 2023. Results: 10,583,799 articles were identified, with 109 included in the final review. Seventeen primary competencies were identified with ethics (77.1%), legality (68.8%), and data security (65.1%) among the top three. Conclusions: Although multiple technologies across specialties were identified, limited literature comprehensively defined technology-enhanced practice competencies to guide practitioner education. To address this gap, the Intersectional Technology Education and Competency in Healthcare (iTECH) Model was created to clarify educational targets for the use of technology in healthcare practices. Model development and finding applications are discussed.

Indexed as

competencyeducationtechnologytelehealthtelemedicinetraining

Identifiers

PMID40352328
PMCPMC12061994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.