ReviewClinical hematology international2025
Relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: standard of care management of patients in the Gulf region.
Review in Clinical hematology international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Burden of Disease, Treatment Patterns, and Healthcare Resource Utilization in Multiple Myeloma in the Middle East and North Africa Region: A Targeted Literature Review.Oncology and therapy · 2026Review
- Kidney Transplantation in Patients with Multiple Myeloma: Current Evidence, Challenges, and Future Directions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clinical management of patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) can be challenging, whereby each relapse is associated with progressively poorer outcomes. In addition, changes in disease biology and patient characteristics hamper treatment strategies in this setting, as do toxicities accumulated across previous lines of therapy. The availability of several new treatment classes has brought about improvements in outcomes, but with median survival in the RRMM setting at only ~32 months, a review of current standard of care treatments and considerations for optimizing care in this setting is warranted. Here, we discuss our preferred approach to treating patients with RRMM, based on our collective experience across the Gulf region. We present position statements for the treatment of lenalidomide-sensitive and -refractory patients, as well as for those patients experiencing late relapse. We discuss the major impact that anti-CD38 agents daratumumab and isatuximab have had on the management of RRMM, which is reflected in our preferred use of daratumumab-based regimens across the lenalidomide-sensitive and -refractory settings. For late-relapse settings, we discuss how bispecific antibodies and chimeric antigen receptor [CAR]-T cells are among the biggest breakthroughs in recent years, achieving excellent responses in triple-class exposed patients. While the use of these agents is not yet widespread in the Gulf region, we advocate their use where available and discuss strategies to manage and minimize common toxicities and adverse events associated with their use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.