Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40352247›Full record

SynthesisNarra J2025

Effectiveness and safety of thoracic segmental spinal anesthesia for breast surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Tasrif Hamdi, Ekawaty S Mastari, Andriamuri P Lubis, Imam Ghozali, Nadia Kemalasari, Awi Tm Harahap

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Narra J, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tasrif HamdiDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia.
Ekawaty S MastariInstitut Kesehatan Helvetia, Medan, Indonesia.
Andriamuri P LubisDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia.
Imam GhozaliFaculty of Medicine, Universitas Lampung, Bandar Lampung, Indonesia.
Nadia KemalasariFaculty of Medicine, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia.
Awi Tm HarahapFaculty of Medicine, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

General anesthesia is the standard approach for thoracic and abdominal procedures; however, it has notable limitations, particularly in high-risk patients. Regional anesthesia techniques, such as thoracic segmental spinal anesthesia, have gained popularity due to their potential to reduce these associated risks. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness and safety of thoracic segmental spinal anesthesia in breast cancer surgery using systematic review and meta-analysis. This study adhered to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines, conducting a comprehensive literature search across ScienceDirect, Cochrane Library, and PubMed databases up to July 4, 2024. The inclusion criteria focused on studies that provided specific information on the effectiveness (postoperative pain reduction) and safety (incidence of adverse events and complications) of thoracic segmental spinal anesthesia, as well as satisfaction among patients and surgeons. Out of 4,060 articles, six studies were included for qualitative assessment, with four further analyzed quantitatively. Meta-analysis findings indicated that thoracic segmental spinal anesthesia provided significantly better pain control at 12 hours postoperatively (SMD: -1.25; 95%CI: -1.54 to -0.96;

Indexed as

Anesthesia, SpinalBreast NeoplasmsPostoperative PainFemaleHumansThoracic Vertebraebreast cancerpatient satisfactionpostoperative painsurgeon satisfactionThoracic segmental spinal anesthesia

Identifiers

PMID40352247
PMCPMC12059862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.