Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40352244›Full record

ReviewNarra J2025

Artificial intelligence-based deep learning algorithms for ground-glass opacity nodule detection: A review.

Henil P Shah, Agha Sah Naqvi, Parth Rajput, Hanan Ambra, Harrini Venkatesh, Junaid Saleem, Sudarshan Saravanan, Mayur Wanjari, Gaurav Mittal

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Narra J, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Henil P ShahGMERS Medical College, Gujarat, India.
Agha Sah NaqviPakistan Institute of Medical Science, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Parth RajputGMERS Medical College, Gujarat, India.
Hanan AmbraKMCT Medical College, Kerala, India.
Harrini VenkateshSri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research (SRIHER), Chennai, India.
Junaid SaleemFederal Medical College, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Sudarshan SaravananGovt. Stanley Medical College, Chennai, India.
Mayur WanjariDepartment of Research and Development, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, India.
Gaurav MittalMahatma Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Sevagram, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ground-glass opacities (GGOs) are hazy opacities on chest computed tomography (CT) scans that can indicate various lung diseases, including early COVID-19, pneumonia, and lung cancer. Artificial intelligence (AI) is a promising tool for analyzing medical images, such as chest CT scans. The aim of this study was to evaluate AI models' performance in detecting GGO nodules using metrics like accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F1 score, area under the curve (AUC) and precision. We designed a search strategy to include reports focusing on deep learning algorithms applied to high-resolution CT scans. The search was performed on PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, and ScienceDirect to identify studies published between 2016 and 2024. Quality appraisal of included studies was conducted using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) tool, assessing the risk of bias and applicability concerns across four domains. Two reviewers independently screened studies reporting the diagnostic ability of AI-assisted CT scans in early GGO detection, where the review results were synthesized qualitatively. Out of 5,247 initially identified records, we found 18 studies matching the inclusion criteria of this study. Among evaluated models, DenseNet achieved the highest accuracy of 99.48%, though its sensitivity and specificity were not reported. WOANet showed an accuracy of 98.78%, with a sensitivity of 98.37% and high specificity of 99.19%, excelling particularly in specificity without compromising sensitivity. In conclusion, AI models can potentially detect GGO on chest CT scans. Future research should focus on developing hybrid models that integrate various AI approaches to improve clinical applicability.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceDeep LearningLung NeoplasmsTomography, X-Ray ComputedAlgorithmsCOVID-19HumansSensitivity and Specificitydeep neural networkGround glass opacityhigh-resolution CT-scanpulmonary noduleX-ray image

Identifiers

PMID40352244
PMCPMC12059966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.