Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40352242›Full record

SynthesisNarra J2025

Diagnostic accuracy of preoperative ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy in distinguishing malignancy in large thyroid nodules: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression.

Putri O Zulfa, Muhammad Iqhrammullah, Hendra Zufry

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Narra J, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Putri O ZulfaMedical Research Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh, Indonesia.
Muhammad IqhrammullahFaculty of Public Health, Universitas Muhammadiyah Aceh, Banda Aceh, Indonesia.
Hendra ZufryDivision of Endocrinology, Metabolic, and Diabetes, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh, Indonesia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Controversy persists regarding the effectiveness of ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy (US-FNAB) in distinguishing malignancies in large thyroid nodules. The prevailing belief that larger thyroid nodules inherently pose a higher risk of malignancy has led to a common practice of suggesting thyroidectomy for large thyroid nodules. Herein, the aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of preoperative US-FNAB for distinguishing malignancy in large thyroid nodules. A search for published records was carried out on October 20, 2023, utilizing the search feature available on PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Google Scholar. Patients with large thyroid nodules (3 cm or larger) who underwent preoperative US-FNAB and postoperative histopathological tests were included. Related outcomes, including false positive, false negative, true negative, true positive, specificity, and sensitivity, were extracted from each study. Pooled specificity and sensitivity were estimated, and the summarized receiver operating characteristic (sROC) curve, along with the summarized area under the curve (sAUC), was calculated. Out of 133 articles identified across four databases, ten studies with a total sample of 2752 patients were included. The overall diagnostic sensitivity was 72% (95%CI: 50-86%;

Indexed as

Thyroid NeoplasmsThyroid NoduleBiopsy, Fine-NeedleDiagnosis, DifferentialHumansSensitivity and SpecificityUltrasonographyaccuracyfine-needle aspirationhistopathologyLarge thyroid nodulereview

Identifiers

PMID40352242
PMCPMC12059824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.