Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40352228›Full record

ArticleNarra J2025

Preferences for a new vaccine against an emerging infectious disease: A discrete choice experiment among Millennials and Generation Z in Vietnam.

Gam H Pham, Quang V Tran, Hiep T Bui, Thoai D Nguyen, Trung Q Vo, Arom Jedsadayanmata, Bon H Huynh, Nia K Sholihat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Narra J, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Gam H PhamFaculty of Pharmacy, Pham Ngoc Thach University of Medicine, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam.
Quang V TranFaculty of Pharmacy, Pham Ngoc Thach University of Medicine, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam.
Hiep T BuiFaculty of Pharmacy, Pham Ngoc Thach University of Medicine, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam.
Thoai D NguyenFaculty of Pharmacy, Pham Ngoc Thach University of Medicine, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam.
Trung Q VoFaculty of Pharmacy, Pham Ngoc Thach University of Medicine, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam.
Arom JedsadayanmataFaculty of Pharmacy, Thammasat University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Bon H HuynhDepartment of Pharmacology - Clinical Pharmacy, Da Nang University of Medical Technology and Pharmacy, Danang, Vietnam.
Nia K SholihatDepartment of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universitas Jenderal Soedirman, Purwokerto, Indonesia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rising threat of emerging infectious diseases (EIDs) highlights the need to understand factors influencing vaccine adoption. The aim of this study was to explore the willingness to vaccinate and vaccine acceptance preferences among Millennials and Generation Z in Vietnam. Convenience sampling was conducted, after which a traditional discrete choice experiment was performed. Participants were tasked with selecting their preferred options from a set of eight vaccination choice tasks, each consisting of two alternatives distinguished by varying degrees of vaccine efficacy, side effects, influential endorsements, trusted sources, and disease susceptibility through literature reviews, expert interviews, and pilot tests. A minimum sample size of 375 participants was recruited via Internet- based and paper-based surveys. A latent class model was used to explore the heterogeneity in participant preferences, while a mixed logit model was employed to facilitate the computation of the predicted probabilities of vaccine acceptance. Among the 818 included participants, 494 (60.4%) were Millennials generation. The predicted probability of vaccine acceptance was 61.8%, with slight differences between Millennials (62.4%) and Generation Z (61.0%). Four latent classes with significant preference variations were identified. Class 1 (38%) was influenced by vaccine effectiveness, side effects, and health authority recommendations, showing lower opt-out rates. Class 2 (28%) prioritized vaccine effectiveness and authority recommendations but had higher opt-out rates and a stronger religious influence. Class 3 (23%) focused on vaccine effectiveness and side effects, with a tendency to opt-out. Class 4 (11%) valued high vaccine effectiveness and advice from family, with infection risks to family or local areas being significant motivators. Influential voices were more important in Classes 1 and 2, while side effects and effectiveness were prioritized in Classes 3 and 4. In conclusion, Vietnamese Millennials and Generation Z preferred vaccination when the vaccine had 90% efficacy, mild to moderate side effects, endorsements from the Ministry of Health, positive recommendations from family and social networks, and high exposure risks from family members.

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorCommunicable Diseases, EmergingPatient Acceptance of Health CareVaccinationVaccination HesitancyVaccinesAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesVietnamYoung AdultVaccinesdiscrete choiceemerging infectious diseasesvaccinesVietnamWillingness to accept

Identifiers

PMID40352228
PMCPMC12059834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.