SynthesisNarra J2025
Predicting the risks of stroke, cardiovascular disease, and peripheral vascular disease among people with type 2 diabetes with artificial intelligence models: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Narra J, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Rethinking the Diabetes-Cardiovascular Disease Continuum: Toward Integrated Care.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Macrovascular complications, including stroke, cardiovascular disease (CVD), and peripheral vascular disease (PVD), significantly contribute to morbidity and mortality in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of artificial intelligence (AI) models in predicting these complications, emphasizing applicability in diverse healthcare settings. Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic search of six databases was conducted, yielding 46 eligible studies with 184 AI models. Predictive performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). Subgroup analyses examined model performance by outcome type, predictor data (lab-only, non-lab, mixed), and algorithm type. Heterogeneity was evaluated using
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.