SynthesisNarra J2025
Impact of lumbar support on pain reduction in low back pain patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials.
Synthesis in Narra J, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Lumbar Belt for Nonspecific Low Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2026Trial
- Evaluating Interface Pressure Distribution and Range of Motion in a Mesh-Structure 3D-Printed Lumbar Brace.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Clinical effectiveness of lumbosacral orthoses in chronic non-specific low back pain: a systematic review.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2026Review
- Bracing and Activity Restriction After Lumbar Discectomy Surgery: An International Survey of AO Spine Members.Neurospine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Low back pain (LBP) is a global health concern, affecting millions and contributing significantly to disability and economic burden. Various non-pharmacological interventions, including lumbar support, have been explored for LBP management. However, its efficacy remains debated due to inconsistent findings. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of lumbar support on pain reduction in individuals with LBP and compare its effectiveness to alternative interventions. A systematic search was conducted across multiple databases (PubMed, ScienceDirect, Scopus, SpringerLink, Google Scholar, and ProQuest) for studies published up to 2023. Data from six search engines were searched using inclusion criteria based on the PICO framework. Search terms included low back pain, lumbar support, lumbar orthose and randomized controlled trial, combined using Boolean operators. Sixteen randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included in the systematic review, with eight studies analyzed in the meta-analysis. Eligible studies focused on adults with non-specific LBP, assessing pain levels using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The meta-analysis was assessed using the standardized mean difference (SMD) in the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The meta-analysis revealed a statistically significant pain reduction with lumbar support compared to other interventions (SMD: 1.33; 95%CI: -2.09-(-0.57));
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.