ArticleFrontiers in physiology2025
Quantifying ventilatory control with 3% CO2 inhalation during exercise.
Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Influence of brief carbon dioxide inhalation on acute exercise performance and recovery: A pilot study.Physiological reports · 2026Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: CO2 mediated ventilation is mainly controlled by two homeostatic mechanisms. The central chemoreceptors are slower mechanisms that focus on blood pH sensing in the brain stem while the peripheral chemoreceptors are quicker to respond and reside in the carotid bodies. Quantification of these mechanisms in humans remain debated. Objective: To quantify the impact that the central and peripheral chemoreceptors have on ventilation in response to changes in PETCO2 during exercise with normoxic breathing and 3% CO2 inhalation. Method: Six healthy males participated in a 5-stage bike protocol with and without 3% CO2 inhalation. We analyzed the time series data of their breath-by-breath PETCO2 and ventilation and generated a one input-one output model via the Laguerre expansion technique (LET) to construct the gain function and quantify the low (0.002-0.029 Hz) and high (0.03-0.15 Hz) frequency components using the weighted gain averages (WGA) as estimators of central and peripheral chemoreflex mechanisms respectively. Results: 3% CO2 inhalation caused a significant increase the high frequency WGAs at rest and in all levels of exercise except heavy exercise. The low frequency WGAs, however, only maintain significance during rest and the baseline session of exercise. Conclusion: Changes in WGA can be used as quantitative estimates of central and peripheral chemoreflexes. 3% CO2 activates both reflexes and is more apparent in the higher frequency WGAs during exercise due to the oxygen dependent mechanisms effects of exercise.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.