ArticleFrontiers in rehabilitation sciences2025
A comparative study of blood pressure submission between mobilec app users and non-users in Romania: a pilot cohort study.
Article in Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Medication Adherence Measurement in Southeast Europe: A Comparative Analysis of Assessment Methods, Digital Health Implementation, and Regulatory Frameworks.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) represent a major public health concern in Romania. Despite the importance of home blood pressure (BP) monitoring, adherence to this practice remains limited. With the growing availability of eHealth solutions, this study aimed to evaluate the user experience and engagement of individuals with and without CVD in using telemonitoring technology. Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted involving 24 participants who used a smartwatch application for telemonitoring. In addition, 176 participants who did not use the application were surveyed through an online questionnaire to serve as a comparison group. Participants were included regardless of CVD status. Data collected included blood pressure submission frequency, app usage metrics, and daily step counts. The cohort using the smartwatch app was observed over a 60-day period. Results: Among the participants, 58.3% were male and 41.7% were female, with a mean age of 50.57 years. The average number of active app usage days was 47.5 out of 60, and blood pressure was submitted on average 31.79 days. The average daily step count was 4,624 steps. In comparison, the reference group (non-app users) submitted BP data on average 7.41 days out of 60. A positive correlation was observed between active usage and BP submissions in the app group, indicating higher engagement with the telemonitoring intervention. Variability in user involvement was noted, with moderate but periodic participation. Discussion: This pilot study suggests that Romanian patients are more likely to engage with mobile health technologies for hypertension management compared to traditional care approaches. The use of telemonitoring devices was associated with greater adherence to vital sign reporting. However, limitations such as small sample size, potential self-selection bias, and lack of randomization must be considered. Further research with larger, randomized control trials and extended follow-up is necessary to validate these findings. Empowering patients through eHealth solutions, alongside clinician support, may help mitigate the burden of cardiovascular diseases in Romania.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.