ReviewSchizophrenia bulletin open2025
Personal Explanations for Psychosis: A Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis.
Review in Schizophrenia bulletin open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Theoretical Perspectives on the Minimal and Narrative Self in the Schizophrenia Spectrum: An Integrative Review.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive sciencePooled it
- The dynamic interplay between anxiety-related, psychotic, and suicidal experiences: a qualitative study.BMC psychiatry · 2025Trial
- Cultural psychiatry in Flanders, Belgium: an exploratory focus group study and position statement.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2026Article
- Social inclusion of people with severe mental illness: a review of current practices, evidence and unmet needs, and future directions.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Hypothesis: Psychosis refers to the state whereby one's experience of reality differs from those around them. The ineffability of psychosis does not render the experience void of meaning, and the ways individuals integrate their experiences of psychosis into their life narratives cannot be dismissed. Meaning is an essential part of recovery. This review aimed to identify categories of personal explanations that people with psychosis use to explain their experiences. Study Design: This systematic review is based on a preregistered protocol (CRD42023421125). Four databases, MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and PsycINFO, and 5 journals were searched April to November 2023. Qualitative and mixed-methods studies that explored the personal explanations employed by adults who experience psychosis, regardless of diagnostic status, were included. Study Results: Twenty-five studies met the inclusion criteria, representing the views of 682 participants from 15 countries. Included studies were appraised using the CASP Qualitative Studies Checklist. Results: were synthesized using thematic analysis. Personal explanations for psychosis experiences were grouped into 5 themes: Physical and psychiatric; Traumatic and adversarial; Emotional; Religious, spiritual, and magical; No explanation. Participants reported multiple explanations for their experiences. Conclusions: Individuals with experience of psychosis seek to explain these experiences, and these personal explanations may be multiple and complex in nature. The identified personal explanations can be used to further explore the ways that people situate their experiences into their personal context. This understanding should be utilized by professionals to support the provision of recovery-oriented care, with implications for assessment, treatment, intervention, and recovery outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.