Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40352111›Full record

ReviewSchizophrenia bulletin open2025

Personal Explanations for Psychosis: A Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis.

Benjamin-Rose Ingall, Merly McPhilbin, Felix Lewandowski, Yasuhiro Kotera, Gerald Jordan, Mike Slade, Fiona Ng

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Schizophrenia bulletin open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Cultural psychiatry in Flanders, Belgium: an exploratory focus group study and position statement.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Benjamin-Rose IngallSchool of Health Sciences, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2TU, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2449-2719
Merly McPhilbinSchool of Health Sciences, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2TU, United Kingdom.
Felix LewandowskiSchool of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2TU, United Kingdom.
Yasuhiro KoteraSchool of Health Sciences, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2TU, United Kingdom.
Gerald JordanSchool of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom.
Mike SladeSchool of Health Sciences, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2TU, United Kingdom.
Fiona NgSchool of Health Sciences, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2TU, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Hypothesis: Psychosis refers to the state whereby one's experience of reality differs from those around them. The ineffability of psychosis does not render the experience void of meaning, and the ways individuals integrate their experiences of psychosis into their life narratives cannot be dismissed. Meaning is an essential part of recovery. This review aimed to identify categories of personal explanations that people with psychosis use to explain their experiences. Study Design: This systematic review is based on a preregistered protocol (CRD42023421125). Four databases, MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and PsycINFO, and 5 journals were searched April to November 2023. Qualitative and mixed-methods studies that explored the personal explanations employed by adults who experience psychosis, regardless of diagnostic status, were included. Study Results: Twenty-five studies met the inclusion criteria, representing the views of 682 participants from 15 countries. Included studies were appraised using the CASP Qualitative Studies Checklist. Results: were synthesized using thematic analysis. Personal explanations for psychosis experiences were grouped into 5 themes: Physical and psychiatric; Traumatic and adversarial; Emotional; Religious, spiritual, and magical; No explanation. Participants reported multiple explanations for their experiences. Conclusions: Individuals with experience of psychosis seek to explain these experiences, and these personal explanations may be multiple and complex in nature. The identified personal explanations can be used to further explore the ways that people situate their experiences into their personal context. This understanding should be utilized by professionals to support the provision of recovery-oriented care, with implications for assessment, treatment, intervention, and recovery outcomes.

Indexed as

meaning makingpersonal explanationspsychosisschizophreniasense makingsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID40352111
PMCPMC12062962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.