ArticleArchives of academic emergency medicine2025
Predicting the Need for Tertiary Trauma Care Using a Multivariable Model: A 4-Year Retrospective Cohort Study.
Article in Archives of academic emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Delays in accessing an appropriate level of care can lead to significant morbidity or even mortality of trauma patients. This study aimed to develop a simplified prehospital predictive model to determine the need for tertiary care trauma centers (TTC), enabling timely and appropriate transport decisions by emergency medical service (EMS) teams. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study conducted at the emergency department (ED) of Ramathibodi Hospital between January 2020 and April 2024. Prehospital trauma patients aged ≥15 years who were transported by EMS were included in the study. Patients were divided into two groups with and without the need for TTC, and the independent predictive factors of the need for TTC were explored using multivariable regression analysis. Results: The study included 440 trauma patients, with 31.1% requiring TTC. The predictors of the need for TTC included age (coefficient (Coef.) -0.003; 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.018 to 0.012; P=0.693), traffic mechanism (Coef. 0.848; 95%CI: 0.150 to 1.546; P=0.017), respiratory rate (Coef. 0.044; 95%CI: -0.037 to 1.124; P=0.285), heart rate (Coef. -0.004; 95%CI: -0.020 to 0.012; P=0.610), and Glasgow Coma Scale (Coef. -0.312; 95%CI: -0.451 to -0.173; P<0.001). The predictive model categorized patients into low, moderate, and high-risk groups. Patients who were categorized in the high-risk group showed a positive likelihood ratio (LHR+) of 14.88 for requiring TTC. The model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AuROC) of 73%, indicating the good discriminative ability of this prediction model. Conclusions: The predictive model classifies trauma patients into three risk groups based on five prognostic variables, which are able to predict the likelihood of requiring TTC. Internal validation has verified its high level of accuracy in trauma triage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.