Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40352100›Full record

ArticleArchives of academic emergency medicine2025

Predictive Factors of Length of Stay in Intensive Care Unit after Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery based on Machine Learning Methods.

Alireza Jafarkhani, Behzad Imani, Soheila Saeedi, Amir Shams

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of academic emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alireza JafarkhaniDepartment of Operating Room, School of Paramedicine, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.
Behzad ImaniDepartment of Operating Room, School of Paramedicine, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.
Soheila SaeediDepartment of Health Information Technology, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.
Amir ShamsDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, School of Medicine, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery requires an extended length of stay (LOS) in the intensive care unit (ICU). This study aimed to predict the factors affecting LOS in the ICU after CABG surgery using machine learning methods. Methods: In this study, after extracting factors affecting the LOS of patients in the ICU after CABG surgery from the literature and confirming these factors by experts, the medical records of 605 patients at Farshchian Specialized Heart Hospital were reviewed between April 20 and August 9, 2024. Four machine learning models were trained and tested to predict the most desired factors, and finally, the performance of the models was evaluated based on the relevant criteria. Results: The most important predictors of the LOS of CABG patients in the ICU were the length of intubation, body mass index (BMI), age, duration of surgery, and the number of postoperative transfusions of packed cells. The Random Forest model also performed best in predicting the effective factors (Mean square Error = 1.64, Mean absolute error = 0.93, and R Conclusion: The insights gained from the mashine learning model highlight the significance of demographic and clinical variables in predicting LOS in ICU. By understanding these predictors, healthcare professionals can better identify patients at higher risk for prolonged ICU stays.

Indexed as

Coronary Artery BypassIntensive Care UnitsLength of StayMachine LearningRandom Forest

Identifiers

PMID40352100
PMCPMC12065027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.