Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40352072›Full record

ArticleAlpha psychiatry2025

Turkish Adaptation of the Screening Questionnaire for Intermittent Explosive Disorder.

Sinem Çetin Demirtaş, Lut Tamam, Mehmet Emin Demirkol, Caner Yeşiloğlu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alpha psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sinem Çetin DemirtaşPsychiatry Clinic, Adana 5 Ocak State Hospital, 01100 Adana, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9536-2335
Lut TamamDepartment of Psychiatry, Cukurova University Faculty of Medicine, 01380 Adana, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9750-7531
Mehmet Emin DemirkolDepartment of Psychiatry, Cukurova University Faculty of Medicine, 01380 Adana, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3965-7360
Caner YeşiloğluDepartment of Psychiatry, Cukurova University Faculty of Medicine, 01380 Adana, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9997-351X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Intermittent Explosive Disorder (IED) is an impulse-control disorder characterized by the inability to control emotions and behaviors, resulting in behaviors that violate social norms and the rights of others. The IED Screening Questionnaire (IED-SQ) is a valuable tool that can quickly identify the presence of IED in adults by Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-5 (DSM-5) criteria. This study evaluated a form of the IED-SQ that had been translated into Turkish, and investigated the reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the IED-SQ. Methods: Seventy-one adult IED patients and 68 adult controls participated. The Barratt Impulsivity Scale (BIS-11), Minnesota Impulse Control Disorder Interview Scale (MIDI), Buss Perry Aggression Questionnaire (BPAQ), Symptom Checklist 90-Revised (SCL-90-R), Wender Utah Rating Scale (WURS), and IED-SQ were administered to the participants. Results: The Cronbach's α coefficient of the IED-SQ was 0.74. The subscales of the BPAQ, including physical aggression, verbal aggression, hostility, and anger, along with the attention and non-planning impulsivity subscales of the BIS-11, were incorporated into the multivariate analysis to identify factors independently associated with the IED-SQ. According to the model, the correct classification percentage was found to be 95%. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that the Turkish version of the IED-SQ is valid and reliable and can be used in clinical practices to identify the presence of IED.

Indexed as

intermittent explosive disorderreliabilityscale adaptationvalidity

Identifiers

PMID40352072
PMCPMC12059778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.