Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40352018›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Effectiveness of Telemedicine Interventions for Infection Prevention and Control: A Systematic Review.

Anas E Ahmed, Omar A Alsunusi, Hussain A Alamer, Elaf A Shubayli, Haya A Alqahtani, Raghad K Juraybi, Atheer M Aboud, Mohammed S Alshihri, Aeshah H Almaghrabi, Wassal F Aljohani and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Anas E AhmedCommunity Medicine, Jazan University, Jazan, SAU.
Omar A AlsunusiCollege of Medicine, Jazan University, Jazan, SAU.
Hussain A AlamerCollege of Medicine, Jazan University, Jazan, SAU.
Elaf A ShubayliCollege of Medicine, Jazan University, Jazan, SAU.
Haya A AlqahtaniCollege of Medicine, Jazan University, Jazan, SAU.
Raghad K JuraybiCollege of Medicine, Jazan University, Jazan, SAU.
Atheer M AboudCollege of Medicine and Health Sciences, Arabian Gulf University, Manama, BHR.
Mohammed S AlshihriGeneral Practice, Primary Health Care Department, Aseer Health Cluster, Aseer, SAU.
Aeshah H AlmaghrabiCollege of Medicine and Health Sciences, Arabian Gulf University, Manama, BHR.
Wassal F AljohaniCollege of Medicine, Taif University, Taif, SAU.
Ali M AlmudawiCollege of Medicine, King Khalid University, Abha, SAU.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infection prevention and control is a critical aspect of healthcare delivery, especially during the ongoing challenges posed by the coronavirus pandemic. Telemedicine has emerged as a valuable strategy for reducing the risk of infection transmission while maintaining the continuity of care. This systematic review evaluates the effectiveness, benefits, and challenges of telemedicine interventions aimed at improving infection prevention and control across various healthcare settings. A comprehensive literature search was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines using databases including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the Virtual Health Library, covering studies published up to November 2024. Studies eligible for inclusion comprised randomized trials, observational studies, and mixed-methods research assessing telemedicine applications for infection control. The methodological quality of studies was assessed using established tools for qualitative and quantitative research appraisal. Five studies met the inclusion criteria and highlighted several positive outcomes. Telemedicine interventions such as mobile applications, remote video assessments of infection control practices, and virtual infection control consultations were associated with reduced infection rates, improved compliance with preventive protocols, and timely identification of procedural gaps. In inpatient settings, telemedicine also helped conserve protective equipment and reduce staff exposure. High patient satisfaction and maintained quality of care were commonly reported. However, several challenges were identified, including technical barriers, increased workload for healthcare workers, and concerns regarding data security. These findings suggest that telemedicine is a promising and adaptable solution for enhancing infection prevention efforts, but successful implementation depends on addressing operational barriers, ensuring adequate training, and strengthening infrastructure. Further rigorous research is needed to evaluate the long-term impact and cost-effectiveness of telemedicine in infection control.

Indexed as

digital healthhealthcare-associated infectionshealthcare deliveryinfection controlinfection preventioninfection risk reductionpatient safetyremote healthcaretelehealth interventionstelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID40352018
PMCPMC12066080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.