ArticleCureus2025
Two Simultaneous Primary Cancers: A Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
When a patient is diagnosed with more than one tumor in the same organ or in a different one, there may be multiple primary tumors. We present the case of a patient with an initial diagnosis of undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS) of the posterior region of the neck in whom an extension study was requested after surgery prior to the systemic therapy; tumor activity was identified in the left testicle, and radical orchiectomy was performed with the result of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) B cells. Multiple primary neoplasms have different histologies and different sites of origin. The interest of the case arises from the clinical presentation in which the patient is being staged due to a previously diagnosed malignant tumor, and a second tumor is detected in the positron emission tomography (PET) scan. Because of the characteristics of the first neoplasm, it is very unlikely that it could correspond to metastasis of the known primary tumor; therefore, it is suspected to be another primary tumor that requires histological confirmation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.