ArticleCureus2025
Comparison of Thermal Imaging and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Evaluating the Extension of Diabetic Foot Infections: A Report of Two Cases.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diabetic foot disease is a severe complication of diabetes mellitus that can lead to infection, ulceration, and amputation. Accurate assessment of the extent of infection is crucial for effective treatment. Advancements in technology, such as thermal imaging, have shown promise as bedside adjuncts in diabetic foot assessment. This report of two cases compares the efficacy of thermal imaging and the gold-standard magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in evaluating the extent of diabetic foot infections in two patients. Thermal imaging and MRI were used preoperatively to assess diabetic foot infections. Thermal imaging showed a reduced temperature around the ulcer, correlating with necrotic tissues; however, it lacked the comprehensive detail provided by MRI. MRI accurately delineated the depth and extent of infection, identified potential bone involvement, and detected subtle soft tissue changes, features that thermal imaging lacked. MRI remains indispensable for its superior ability to provide detailed anatomical information and assess the full extent of infection, which is critical for surgical decision-making and long-term management. The complementary use of both modalities may enhance diagnostic accuracy, with thermal imaging serving as an accessible preliminary tool and MRI providing the necessary depth for complex cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.