ArticleCureus2025
Validation of Electromagnetic Field Sensor Performance Through Porcine Skulls: Implications for Neurostimulation and Recording Techniques.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evidence-Based Interventions for Functional Restoration and Pain Management following Traumatic Brain Injury.Archives of clinical and medical case reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent technological advancements have led to the development of portable helmet systems equipped with induction sensor stimulators for non-invasively monitoring neural electromagnetic fields in real-time. The helmet incorporates a Mu-metal shield, a material designed to block low-frequency electromagnetic fields and to reduce external interference. This study utilized an adult pig model to validate the ability of these sensors to record and stimulate neural activity through pig skulls, which closely mimic human cranial anatomy. Sensor-stimulators, which both detect and deliver electromagnetic stimulation, were integrated into the helmet for neural activity monitoring. Employing proprietary BS-1000 induction sensor stimulators integrated into a custom-designed helmet, our research focused on the efficacy of transmitting and modulating electromagnetic fields (EMFs) beyond the varied thicknesses of the pig skull. Induction sensors, a type of electromagnetic field sensor, were used to measure neural signals non-invasively. The experimental setup included measuring EMF responses at baseline and under conditions of incremental cranial barrier thicknesses, assessing both the recording and stimulating capabilities of the system. Results indicated that the EMF penetrated the swine skull and that the sensors maintained signal integrity and functionality despite increases in bone thickness of the pig skull compared to humans, successfully capturing and stimulating neural activity across all tested scenarios. These findings demonstrate the potential of this technology for non-invasive neuromodulation and neural monitoring. Its application in traumatic brain injury (TBI) research could facilitate real-time assessment of neural function and aid in the development of targeted therapeutic interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.