ArticleCureus2025
Disparities in End-of-Life Outcomes: A Demographic and Geographic Analysis of Endometrial Cancer Deaths in the United States.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionEndometrial cancer poses a significant public health challenge globally. With an increasing incidence, understanding end-of-life outcomes becomes crucial in navigating this landscape. This study aims to explore disparities in endometrial cancer death locations across demographic and geographic parameters. METHODOLOGY: Using the Centre for Disease Control and Prevention - Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research (CDC WONDER) database, data on endometrial cancer deaths were retrieved and analysed. Logistic and linear regression models were employed to identify predictors and trends in place of death.
resultsThe study identified 90,140 endometrial cancer deaths from 1999 to 2020. Age-specific analysis revealed higher mortality rates in the 64-75 years age group. Geographically, the South reported the highest mortality rates. White individuals exhibited higher death rates across all settings. Age, race, and geographic disparities were evident in endometrial cancer death locations.
conclusionsUnderstanding end-of-life outcomes in endometrial cancer is crucial for improving patient care. Tailored interventions addressing demographic and geographic disparities are essential for ensuring equitable and dignified end-of-life care for individuals with endometrial cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.