ArticleCureus2025
Transient Anti-Glutamic Acid Decarboxylase (GAD) Antibody Positivity and Insulin Secretion Reduction After IVIg in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This report describes a patient with type 2 diabetes mellitus who received intravenous immunoglobulin therapy for Guillain-Barré syndrome and subsequently experienced a sudden deterioration in glycemic control. Although anti-glutamate decarboxylase antibodies became positive and insulin secretion was transiently suppressed, both findings returned to baseline during the follow-up period. These changes initially raised concerns about new-onset or coexisting type 1 diabetes mellitus; however, the reversibility of anti-glutamate decarboxylase antibody positivity and the eventual restoration of insulin secretion argued against a new or evolving form of autoimmune diabetes. In type 2 diabetes, chronic inflammation may predispose individuals to immune dysregulation, and receiving intravenous immunoglobulin could transiently exacerbate underlying metabolic instability. In this case, however, the marked hyperglycemia and the brief period of suppressed insulin secretion did not lead to sustained autoimmune activity or permanent β-cell dysfunction. Instead, the patient's anti-glutamate decarboxylase levels reverted to normal, insulin production capacity improved, and classification as type 2 diabetes mellitus was ultimately reaffirmed. These findings underscore the need for clinicians to remain vigilant when interpreting new-onset antibody positivity or metabolic disturbances that arise shortly after intravenous immunoglobulin therapy. Repeated assessment of both antibody levels and insulin secretion is crucial to avoid premature changes in diabetes classification or therapeutic strategies based solely on transient antibody elevation. This case highlights the importance of recognizing that anti-glutamate decarboxylase antibody positivity and corresponding hyperglycemia can be induced transiently by immunoglobulin therapy and do not necessarily indicate progression to type 1 diabetes mellitus. Regular monitoring of metabolic parameters and clinical status over time can ensure more accurate diagnosis and management in patients with preexisting diabetes who experience sudden, unexplained changes in blood glucose following immunoglobulin administration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.