ArticleCureus2025
Validity and Reliability of Teleconference-Based Goniometry for Measuring Ankle and Great Toe Joint Range of Motion.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Criterion Validity and Inter-Method Reliability of a Smartphone Sensor-Based Application for Lower-Limb Range of Motion: In-Person vs. Tele-Assessment.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Many studies focused on the positive impact of virtual visits during the COVID-19 pandemic. In the post-pandemic era, research exploring telemedicine's impact on the orthopedic physical examination, particularly for the lower extremities, continues to expand. This research evaluates the validity and reliability of telemedicine measuring ankle and great toe range of motion (ROM). Methods In this prospective study, 59 ankles and 59 great toes were measured by a researcher trained by a licensed occupational therapist for goniometer use both in-person and through telemedicine. Telemedicine measurements were also made by a second researcher. Mean differences and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to assess validity by comparing the ROM between in-person and telemedicine ROM measures. ICCs were used to evaluate reliability by assessing agreement in telemedicine ROM measures between the two different researchers. Results In the evaluation of validity, in-person and telemedicine measurements for both ankle dorsiflexion and plantarflexion revealed ICCs of 0.81, with mean differences equal to -0.64 and -0.93 degrees, respectively. In-person and still-shot photography for ankle dorsiflexion had an ICC of 0.83 and plantarflexion had an ICC of 0.82, with respective mean differences of -1.39 and -0.24 degrees. Hallux extension measurements between in-person and telemedical visits had an ICC of 0.87 (mean difference: 2.34 degrees), whereas still-shot showed an ICC of 0.86 (mean difference: 2.58 degrees). Hallux flexion had an ICC of 0.93 (mean difference: -0.98 degrees) for in-person and telemedical visits and an ICC of 0.95 (mean difference: -1.51 degrees) for in-person and still-shot measures. Conclusion Ankle and great toe joint ROM can be measured effectively during an orthopedic telemedicine visit equivalent to that of an in-person measurement. This supports the idea that a virtual physical ROM exam can increase efficiency for both patients and providers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.