Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40351931›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Preservation of Traumatic Completely Amputated or Avulsed Body Parts in the First Aid Setting: A Scoping Review.

Eunice Singletary, Jorien Laermans, Jen Heng Pek, Pascal Cassan, Daniel Meyran, David Berry, Kaushila Thilakasiri, Therese Djarv

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Eunice SingletaryEmergency Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, USA.
Jorien LaermansDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy, Mechelen, BEL.
Jen Heng PekEmergency Medicine, Sengkang General Hospital, Singapore, SGP.
Pascal CassanIFRC Global Reference First Aid Reference Center, French Red Cross, Paris, FRA.
Daniel MeyranIFRC Global Reference First Aid Reference Center, French Red Cross, Paris, FRA.
David BerryDepartment of Kinesiology, Saginaw Valley State University, Saginaw, USA.
Kaushila ThilakasiriMinistry of Health, Ministry of Health Holdings, Colombo, LKA.
Therese DjarvEmergency Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, SWE.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traumatic amputations or avulsions are physically and emotionally devastating events that may result in long-term disability. Despite increasing global incidence, optimal prehospital preservation strategies are underutilized, reducing the likelihood of successful replantation. This scoping review was performed as part of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation's (ILCOR) continuous evidence evaluation process to update the 2025 ILCOR Consensus on Science with Treatment Recommendations. Our aim was to scope the research literature on prehospital preservation methods used for amputated or avulsed body parts and their impact on replantation success. We searched PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, CINAHL, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform from inception through February 26, 2025, for studies comparing approaches to preserve completely amputated or avulsed body parts in the out-of-hospital setting. Data on first aid intervention characteristics, ischemic times, and replantation outcomes were summarized. We concurrently reviewed first aid guidelines and participant manuals from global organizations to assess strategies taught for the management and storage of amputated body parts. Thirty-nine publications were included in the final analysis, with the majority (73%) being case reports. No randomized controlled trials were identified that directly compared different cold storage techniques (e.g., ice-water immersion vs. dry cold storage). Key findings emphasized the importance of cooling amputated parts after wrapping with saline-moistened gauze and double-bagging to extend ischemic tolerance. This review identified an extensive evidence base suggesting that nonfreezing cold preservation of amputated or avulsed body parts as soon as possible after injury is associated with survival of replantation and improved function and cosmesis. Training first aid providers, standardizing prehospital protocols, and increasing public awareness could enhance patient outcomes and expand access to replantation globally. However, additional studies are needed to identify alternative means of sustained cold storage of amputated body parts, especially in low-resource first aid settings.

Indexed as

amputationavulsionpreservationreplantationscoping review

Identifiers

PMID40351931
PMCPMC12065115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.