ReviewCureus2025
Preservation of Traumatic Completely Amputated or Avulsed Body Parts in the First Aid Setting: A Scoping Review.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- When salvage becomes suffering: re-evaluating the limits of limb preservation in modern orthoplastic surgery.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Article
- Ten Foundational Principles in Hand Surgery: A Primer for Orthopedic Practice.Journal of orthopaedic case reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Traumatic amputations or avulsions are physically and emotionally devastating events that may result in long-term disability. Despite increasing global incidence, optimal prehospital preservation strategies are underutilized, reducing the likelihood of successful replantation. This scoping review was performed as part of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation's (ILCOR) continuous evidence evaluation process to update the 2025 ILCOR Consensus on Science with Treatment Recommendations. Our aim was to scope the research literature on prehospital preservation methods used for amputated or avulsed body parts and their impact on replantation success. We searched PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, CINAHL, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform from inception through February 26, 2025, for studies comparing approaches to preserve completely amputated or avulsed body parts in the out-of-hospital setting. Data on first aid intervention characteristics, ischemic times, and replantation outcomes were summarized. We concurrently reviewed first aid guidelines and participant manuals from global organizations to assess strategies taught for the management and storage of amputated body parts. Thirty-nine publications were included in the final analysis, with the majority (73%) being case reports. No randomized controlled trials were identified that directly compared different cold storage techniques (e.g., ice-water immersion vs. dry cold storage). Key findings emphasized the importance of cooling amputated parts after wrapping with saline-moistened gauze and double-bagging to extend ischemic tolerance. This review identified an extensive evidence base suggesting that nonfreezing cold preservation of amputated or avulsed body parts as soon as possible after injury is associated with survival of replantation and improved function and cosmesis. Training first aid providers, standardizing prehospital protocols, and increasing public awareness could enhance patient outcomes and expand access to replantation globally. However, additional studies are needed to identify alternative means of sustained cold storage of amputated body parts, especially in low-resource first aid settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.