Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40351893›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Physicians' Attitudes and Practices Regarding Drug Allergy Management: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Elias A Alraqibah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Elias A AlraqibahDepartment of Medicine, College of Medicine, Qassim University, Buraydah, SAU.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Drug-induced anaphylaxis is a life-threatening hypersensitivity reaction requiring prompt recognition and management by physicians. Although clinically significant, studies have revealed gaps in physicians' attitudes and practices regarding drug-induced anaphylaxis, potentially affecting patient safety. This study assessed physicians' attitudes and practices related to drug-induced allergies. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted among 167 physicians across four hospitals in the Qassim region using a validated structured questionnaire. The tool assessed three domains: demographic characteristics, attitudes toward drug allergy management, and clinical practices. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics with IBM SPSS Statistics software, version 26 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). Results A total of 167 physicians were included in the study. Attitudes toward drug allergy management were largely positive, with 91.6% (n=153) recognizing the need for advanced training. However, practice patterns varied, with only 50.3% (n=84) consistently recognizing and managing drug hypersensitivity reactions. The availability and routine use of drug allergy testing was reported by 47.3% (n=79), yet accurate interpretation remained low (31.9%, n=53). Although 65.7% (n=110) routinely obtained allergy histories, proper skin test controls were performed by only 20.1% (n=34). Conclusion While physicians exhibited positive attitudes toward drug allergy management, inconsistencies in clinical practice were evident. Deficiencies in diagnostic awareness, reliance on inaccurate testing methods, and variable adherence to management guidelines underscore the need for targeted educational interventions.

Indexed as

anaphylaxisdrug allergydrug hypersensitivitymedical educationphysician practice patternssaudi arabia

Identifiers

PMID40351893
PMCPMC12065473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.