Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40351864›Full record

ArticleThe journal of advanced prosthodontics2025

Effects of dental implant surface treated with sandblasting large grit acid-etching and femtosecond laser on implant stability, marginal bone volume, and histological results in a rabbit model.

Young-Tak Son, KeunBaDa Son, Hoseong Cho, Jae-Mok Lee, Sm Abu Saleah, JunHo Hwang, JongHoon Lee, HyunDeok Kim, Myoung-Uk Jin, Jeehyun Kim and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of advanced prosthodontics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Young-Tak SonDepartment of Dental Science, Graduate School, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8893-5369
KeunBaDa SonAdvanced Dental Device Development Institute, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3177-8005
Hoseong ChoSchool of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, College of IT Engineering, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6091-1450
Jae-Mok LeeDepartment of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0291-6114
Sm Abu SaleahICT Convergence Research Center, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8129-4455
JunHo HwangInstitute of Advanced Convergence Technology, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3440-7218
JongHoon LeeInstitute of Advanced Convergence Technology, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4184-3656
HyunDeok KimInstitute of Advanced Convergence Technology, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2921-8161
Myoung-Uk JinDepartment of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9263-047X
Jeehyun KimSchool of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, College of IT Engineering, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6170-0866
Mansik JeonSchool of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, College of IT Engineering, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0630-9039
Kyu-Bok LeeAdvanced Dental Device Development Institute, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1838-7229

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study was to compare the surface characteristics and healing patterns after implantation of implants treated with SLA and those treated with both SLA and femtosecond laser. MATERIALS AND

methodsA total of 10 male New Zealand white rabbits were used to compare recovery levels between implants treated with SLA (SLA group) and those treated with both SLA and femtosecond laser (SF group). The implants' surface characteristics were determined through topographic evaluation, element analysis, surface roughness, and wettability evaluation. In total, 4 implants were placed in each rabbit (2 in each tibia), with 20 implants per treatment group. Using the implant stability quotient (ISQ), marginal bone volume, and histological analysis (bone-to-implant contact (BIC), bone volume/tissue volume (BV/TV)), and post implantation outcomes were assessed. Outcome data were analyzed using independent t-tests, Mann-Whitney U tests, Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, and one-way ANOVA (α = 0.05).

resultsNo significant differences were noted between SLA and SF groups in terms of ISQ, marginal bone volume, BIC, and BV/TV (

conclusionSurface treatment via SLA and femtosecond laser is feasible compared with SLA treatment alone in terms of ISQ, marginal bone volume, BIC, and BV/TV. However, further clinical research is warranted.

Indexed as

Dental implant surface treatmentFemtosecond laserImplant stabilityOsseointegrationSandblasting acid-etching

Identifiers

PMID40351864
PMCPMC12059371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.