ArticleClinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology2025
Adverse Events Associated with Apremilast and Deucravacitinib for Psoriasis: A Pharmacovigilance Study Based on the FAERS Database.
Article in Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Efficacy and Safety of Oral Icotrokinra in Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Trial Sequential Analysis.International journal of dermatology · 2026Pooled it
- Safety of Icotrokinra Through 1 Year for the Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis and Psoriasis Affecting High-Impact Sites: Pooled Results Across the ICONIC-LEAD, ICONIC-TOTAL, and ICONIC-ADVANCE 1 and 2 Phase 3 Trials.Dermatology and therapy · 2026Article
- Real-World Effectiveness and Safety of Deucravacitinib for Plaque Psoriasis: A Multicenter Study in Korea.Annals of dermatology · 2026Article
- Deucravacitinib in dermatology: current indication and existing off-label data.Drugs in context · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Apremilast and deucravacitinib are oral small-molecule inhibitors approved for the treatment of psoriasis, each with the potential to fill unmet needs among psoriasis patients. Investigating their adverse event (AE) profiles with post-marketing data is essential for optimizing patient care. Methods: We analyzed AE reports from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database during Q1 2014 to Q4 2023. Disproportionality and Bayesian analyses were utilized to compare safety signals. Results: A total of 95,524 and 754 AE reports associated with apremilast and deucravacitinib were retrieved, respectively. Apremilast was more prevalent to cause gastrointestinal AEs such as diarrhea and nausea, as well as psoriasis recurrence and nervous system disorders like headache. Deucravacitinib showed stronger associations with cutaneous AEs, including acne, folliculitis, pruritus, rash, and erythema, along with oral conditions. AEs not previously documented on drug labels, such as sinus headache and multiple allergies for apremilast, and acneiform dermatitis and rosacea for deucravacitinib, were identified. Female patients were exposed to a higher risk for skin-related AEs when using deucravacitinib. Conclusion: Our study offers valuable real-world insights into the safety profiles of apremilast and deucravacitinib. The observed sex differences in adverse events associated with apremilast and deucravacitinib require further investigation in real-world and clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.