ArticleDigital health
Designing a digital intervention for children with developmental language disorder: Aligning theory, research and clinical practice.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Developmental language disorder (DLD) is a neurodevelopmental condition characterised by persistent and pervasive challenges in daily communication. This paper describes the process of designing a digital word-learning intervention for this population that aligns with routine clinical practice, is evidence-based, and has strong theoretical rationale. Method: The intervention design process involved research collaboration between academics, clinicians and software professionals.The Medical Research Council's framework for developing complex interventions provided preliminary guidance; greater design depth was introduced by adding recommended elements from a synthesis of intervention design literature. The resulting intervention design was refined with focus group feedback from speech and language therapists, which underwent reflexive thematic analysis. Results: Intervention design features were generated by aligning word-learning traits characteristic of the disorder with evidence-based vocabulary intervention strategies and clinician requirements for embedding digital practice in routine service-delivery.Mock ups for a mobile intervention app were developed from the design features and shared for refinement with practicing speech and language therapists who had day-to-day experience of supporting children with DLD. Conclusion: This paper outlines the process of defining the therapeutic components of a digital intervention, guided by empirical literature and clinician insights. These initial findings will serve as a foundation for co-designing with children with DLD to shape the final design, particularly in terms of motivation and engagement features.Investing at the design stage in the determinants of successful translation of research into practice, increases the likelihood that the resulting intervention will demonstrate both research effectiveness and clinical uptake.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.