ArticleDigital health
Barriers and facilitators of implementing value-based care: The case of SwissDiabeter.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Digital Quality Monitoring for Type 2 Diabetes in Swiss Primary Care: Qualitative Interview Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Improving metabolic and inflammatory balance prevents periodontal complications in diabetes.World journal of diabetes · 2026Article
- Strategies to Implement Knee Osteoarthritis Guidelines in Switzerland.Public health reviews · 2026Article
- Predicting postprandial glucose excursions to personalize dietary interventions for type-2 diabetes management.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Global spending on diabetes care soared to $966 billion in 2021, a 316% surge over the past 15 years. This sharp increase underscores a need for more efficient and cost-effective care strategies. Value-based care (VBC), which prioritizes patient outcomes while controlling expenses, presents a promising solution. However, its real-world implementation remains challenging, particularly in diabetes care. This study examines SwissDiabeter, a proposed diabetes clinic initiative in Switzerland inspired by a Dutch VBC-based Diabeter clinic. We examine key barriers and facilitators during Diabeter's implementation in the Netherlands and assess forthcoming challenges and enablers for SwissDiabeter in Switzerland. Methods: We employ a deep, extensive embedded single-case design conducting 27 interviews with healthcare professionals, insurers, and patient groups in Switzerland and the Netherlands. The main interview data were complemented by various secondary sources to enhance contextual comprehension, widen perspectives, and validate findings. Results: We identify four key factors for successful VBC adoption: leadership in driving change, financial restructuring, operational improvements, and enabling digital technologies. We next derive practical recommendations to guide the implementation of value-based diabetes care, redesigning financial incentives for healthcare providers, partnering up with key stakeholders such as insurers or policy makers, and measuring outcomes on a voluntary and anonymous basis. Conclusion: This study enhances the global discourse on VBC by analyzing key barriers and facilitators in implementing SwissDiabeter, drawing insights from the Diabeter model in the Netherlands. Our findings highlight the need for strong leadership, financial incentives, digital infrastructure, and interdisciplinary collaboration to drive outcome-driven care. Beyond diabetes, these insights provide a framework for scaling VBC across chronic disease management, promoting cost-effective, high-quality healthcare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.