Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40351836›Full record

ArticleNeuro-oncology advances

Integrated early palliative care for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma: The GLIOSUPPORT feasibility study.

Michel Fabbro, Muriel Thomaso, Amélie Darlix, Virginie Perotin, Caroline Gallay, Marie Charissoux, Anne-Chantal Granier, Nabila Bouazza, Patrice Champoiral, Louise Coutant and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-oncology advances. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Michel FabbroDepartment of Medical Oncology, Montpellier Cancer Institute, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1910-4777
Muriel ThomasoPalliative and Supportive Care Department, Montpellier Cancer Institute, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8567-3874
Amélie DarlixInstitute of Functional Genomics, University of Montpellier, CNRS, INSERM, Montpellier, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1384-1709
Virginie PerotinPalliative and Supportive Care Department, Montpellier Cancer Institute, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8016-3015
Caroline GallayPalliative and Supportive Care Department, Montpellier Cancer Institute, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-3960-1631
Marie CharissouxDepartment of Oncological Radiotherapy, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Anne-Chantal GranierPalliative and Supportive Care Department, Montpellier Cancer Institute, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Nabila BouazzaClinical Research and Innovation Department, Montpellier Cancer Institute, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3054-8774
Patrice ChampoiralPalliative and Supportive Care Department, Montpellier Cancer Institute, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Louise CoutantPalliative and Supportive Care Department, Montpellier Cancer Institute, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Marta JarlierBiometrics Unit, Montpellier Cancer Institute, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Estelle GuerdouxInstitute Desbrest of Epidemiology and Public Health, INSERM UMR 1318, University Montpellier, Montpellier, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9608-0791

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Early palliative care improves the quality of life (QoL) and survival in patients with cancer; however, its effects in patients with glioblastoma remain unclear. The GLIOSUPPORT study assessed the feasibility (adherence; primary objective) of an early palliative care program integrated into the standard glioblastoma care pathway. Secondary objectives included the description of the patients' characteristics, QoL, and neuropsychological changes over time, end-of-life decisions, end-of-life treatments, and family carers' perceptions/experiences. Methods: This interventional, prospective, longitudinal, feasibility study was conducted in a French comprehensive cancer center. Thirty-five patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma were required to reach an adherence rate of 60%. Adherence was defined as going to 3 palliative care visits scheduled every 12 weeks. Baseline characteristics were compared in patients who did and did not adhere to the palliative care program. Minimal clinically important differences and cut-offs were used to quantify QoL changes. Results: The adherence rate was 60% (95% CI [42.1%-76.1%]), indicating that the program was feasible. Visual disturbances, communication/initiation deficits, and anxiety were more frequent in the group that did not adhere to the program. Emotional and social functioning, pain, appetite loss, constipation, and headache increased over time (clinically significant differences), whereas neuropsychological disturbances did not change. Half of the participants identified a family proxy and 8.6% wrote advance directives. One month before death, 28.6% of patients were receiving cancer treatment. Conclusions: Integrating early palliative care in glioblastoma management is feasible. The potential benefits on QoL, mood, and survival must now be evaluated in a larger randomized controlled trial.

Indexed as

adherenceearly palliative carefeasibilityglioblastoma

Identifiers

PMID40351836
PMCPMC12063082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.