ArticleNeuro-oncology advances
Integrated early palliative care for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma: The GLIOSUPPORT feasibility study.
Article in Neuro-oncology advances. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Early palliative care improves the quality of life (QoL) and survival in patients with cancer; however, its effects in patients with glioblastoma remain unclear. The GLIOSUPPORT study assessed the feasibility (adherence; primary objective) of an early palliative care program integrated into the standard glioblastoma care pathway. Secondary objectives included the description of the patients' characteristics, QoL, and neuropsychological changes over time, end-of-life decisions, end-of-life treatments, and family carers' perceptions/experiences. Methods: This interventional, prospective, longitudinal, feasibility study was conducted in a French comprehensive cancer center. Thirty-five patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma were required to reach an adherence rate of 60%. Adherence was defined as going to 3 palliative care visits scheduled every 12 weeks. Baseline characteristics were compared in patients who did and did not adhere to the palliative care program. Minimal clinically important differences and cut-offs were used to quantify QoL changes. Results: The adherence rate was 60% (95% CI [42.1%-76.1%]), indicating that the program was feasible. Visual disturbances, communication/initiation deficits, and anxiety were more frequent in the group that did not adhere to the program. Emotional and social functioning, pain, appetite loss, constipation, and headache increased over time (clinically significant differences), whereas neuropsychological disturbances did not change. Half of the participants identified a family proxy and 8.6% wrote advance directives. One month before death, 28.6% of patients were receiving cancer treatment. Conclusions: Integrating early palliative care in glioblastoma management is feasible. The potential benefits on QoL, mood, and survival must now be evaluated in a larger randomized controlled trial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.