Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40351779›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical signals and sensors2025

Two Machine-learning Hybrid Models for Predicting Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

Rahman Farnoosh, Karlo Abnoosian, Rasha Abbas Isewid

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical signals and sensors, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rahman FarnooshThe School of Mathematics and Computer Science, Statistics, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran.
Karlo AbnoosianThe School of Mathematics and Computer Science, Statistics, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran.
Rasha Abbas IsewidThe School of Mathematics and Computer Science, Statistics, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The global increase in diabetes prevalence necessitates advanced diagnostic methods. Machine learning has shown promise in disease diagnosis, including diabetes. Materials and Methods: We used a dataset collected from the Medical City Hospital laboratory and the Specialized Center for Endocrinology and Diabetes at Al-Kindy Teaching Hospital in Iraq. This dataset includes 1000 physical examination samples from both male and female patients. The samples are categorized into three classes: diabetic (Y), nondiabetic (N), and predicted diabetic (P). The dataset contains twelve attributes and includes outlier data. Outliers in medical studies can result from unusual disease attributes. Therefore, consulting with a specialist physician to identify and handle these outliers using statistical methods is necessary. The main contribution of this study is the proposal of two hybrid models for diabetes diagnosis in two scenarios: (1) Scenario 1 (presence of outlier data): Hybrid Model 1 combines the K-medoids clustering algorithm with a Gaussian naive Bayes (GNB) classifier based on kernel density estimation (KDE) to handle outliers and (2) Scenario 2 (after removing outlier data): Hybrid Model 2 combines the K-means clustering algorithm with a GNB classifier based on KDE with suitable bandwidth. We performed principal component analysis to minimize dimensionality and evaluated the models using fivefold cross-validation. Results: All experiments were conducted in identical settings. Our proposed hybrid models demonstrated superior performance in two scenarios, handling and rejecting outliers, compared to other machine-learning models in this study, including support vector machines (with radial-based, polynomial, linear, and sigmoid kernel functions), decision trees (J48), and GNB classifiers for diabetes prediction. The average accuracy for Scenario 1 with Hybrid Model 1 was 0.9743, and for Scenario 2 with Hybrid Model 2, it was 0.9867. We also evaluated precision, sensitivity, and F1-score as performance metrics. Conclusion: This study presents two hybrid models for diabetes diagnosis, demonstrating high accuracy in distinguishing between diabetic and nondiabetic patients and effectively handling outliers. The findings highlight the potential of machine-learning techniques for improving the early diagnosis and treatment of diabetes.

Indexed as

Decision treediabetes mellitus predictionGaussian naive Bayeskernel density estimationK-meansK-medoidssupport vector machine

Identifiers

PMID40351779
PMCPMC12063970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.