ArticleJournal of medical signals and sensors2025
Multi-classification Deep Learning Approach for Diagnosing Stroke Type and Severity Using Multimodal Magnetic Resonance Images.
Article in Journal of medical signals and sensors, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Deep learning-based cognitive impairment brain imaging analysis: New methods, new technologies, and new paradigms.Neural regeneration research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Clinical decisions for stroke treatments, such as thrombolytic drugs for ischemic strokes or anticoagulants for hemorrhagic strokes, rely on accurate diagnosis and severity assessment. Our study uses diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) to differentiate healthy and stroke samples, classify stroke types, and predict severity, aiding in decision-making for stroke management. Methods: We evaluated 143 patients: 85 with ischemic stroke and 58 with hemorrhagic stroke. For stroke diagnosis, we compared multimodal (apparent diffusion coefficient and diffusion-weighted imaging [DWI]) and single-modal (using separate images) preprocessing techniques. Our study introduced two models, Added CNN Layer-ResNet-50 (ACL-ResNet-50) and Added CNN Layer-MobileNetV1 (ACL-MobileNetV1), based on transfer learning (MobileNetV1 and ResNet-50), enhancing performance through reinforced layers. We compared our proposed models with a scenario in which only the final layer was replaced in ResNet-50 and MobileNetV1. Furthermore, we predicted National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores in three ranges based on DWI images to gauge stroke severity. Evaluation criteria for the models included accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC). Results: In stroke classification (normal, ischemic, and hemorrhagic), ACL-MobileNetV1 outperformed other models, achieving 98% accuracy, 99% sensitivity, 98% specificity, and 99% AUC. For assessing ischemic stroke severity using NIHSS ranges, ACL-ResNet-50 showed the optimal performance with an accuracy of 0.92, sensitivity of 0.84, specificity of 0.92, and AUC of 0.95. Conclusion: Our study's proposed method effectively classified stroke type and severity based on multimodal MR images, potentially as a practical decision support tool for stroke treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.