ArticleAmerican journal of ophthalmology case reports2025
A favorable prognosis case of posttraumatic endophthalmitis possibly from the protective effect of previously implanted implantable collamer lens (ICLs).
Article in American journal of ophthalmology case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To report a favorable prognosis case of post-traumatic endophthalmitis following Implantable Collamer Lens (ICLs) implantation. Observations: A 24-year-old male presented with pain, redness and sudden-onset monocular blurry vision in the left eye immediately following an open globe injury caused by an azalea branch, which subsequently developed into infectious endophthalmitis. Five days prior to presentation, he had undergone ICLs surgery for high myopia of -8.00D. The right eye was normal. In the left eye, the uncorrected visual acuity was hand movement, and there was no improvement in the best corrected visual acuity (BCVA). The intraocular pressure was 30.6 mmHg. We observed a corneal perforation at the 2 o'clock position and a traumatic iris coloboma at the 11 o'clock position. Severe inflammation was present in the anterior chamber, with fibrin, inflammatory cells, and significant exudate in the pupillary area, but inflammation in the posterior segment was mild. The referring physician at the local hospital observed the branch contacting the anterior surface of the ICL through the traumatic iris coloboma at the 11 o'clock position. On the presentation, significant exudation in front of the ICL made it difficult to directly observe the ICL and crystalline lens under the slit lamp. Subsequent examinations revealed no obvious damage to either the ICL or crystalline lens. Anterior chamber irrigation and intracameral vancomycin were performed and we found Gram-positive cocci and white blood cells in his aqueous humor samples. He received systemic and topical broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy combined with corticosteroid treatment for a total of 5 days. Pain and vision loss improved with the resolution of intraocular inflammation. Visual acuity improved to 1.0 on the third day of treatment and remained stable at the 3-month follow-up. Conclusions and importance: Here, we report a case of trauma-induced endophthalmitis with a favorable prognosis. The ICL played a crucial protective role by protecting the lens, thereby preventing potentially devastating outcomes, suggesting the need for increased clinical attention on this matter.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.