Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40351738›Full record

ArticlePatient preference and adherence2025

Gender and Patient Preferences: Unraveling the Decision-Making Process for Blepharoplasty Among Males and Females.

Saif Khuzaim Al-Dossary

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Saif Khuzaim Al-DossaryDepartment of Surgery, College of Medicine, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Blepharoplasty is a popular facial cosmetic surgery, but research on how gender may influence motivations for this eyelid procedure remains limited. Understanding differences can improve patient counseling. Objective: This study examined gender variances in key factors driving blepharoplasty decisions. Methods: Medical records of 100 blepharoplasty patients (50 males, 50 females) were analyzed for demographics and patient-reported reasons underlying surgery choice. Face-to-face surveys further assessed satisfaction and experiences. Results: Social embarrassment concerns declined with patient age but were more commonly reported by men (63.6%) than women (36.4%). Looking younger was overwhelmingly a female motivation (89.3% women vs 10.7% men), especially prevalent among those ages 30-35 (78.6%). Eye heaviness was a shared concern among this age bracket (57.1%), suggesting functional factors. Marriage considerations, though uncommon (3%), remained relevant to younger subgroups (66.7% ages 25-30). Conclusion: Key factors showed both gender divergences and convergences, with men emphasizing functional/social issues and women cosmetic youthfulness. Understanding nuances can help surgeons tailor blepharoplasty patient education.

Indexed as

ageblepharoplastycosmeticfunctiongender differencesmotivation

Identifiers

PMID40351738
PMCPMC12063619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.