Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40351736›Full record

ArticleJournal of patient experience2025

Towards a Novel Patient Experience Survey System: Incorporating Physician Perspectives into Performance Feedback Dashboard Design.

Stacie Vilendrer, Cassandra Bragdon, Rebecca K Miller-Kuhlmann, Nirali Vora, Carl A Gold, Marcy Winget

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of patient experience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Stacie VilendrerDivision of Primary Care and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Cassandra BragdonDivision of Primary Care and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-9269-5738
Rebecca K Miller-KuhlmannDepartment of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Nirali VoraDepartment of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Carl A GoldDepartment of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Marcy WingetDivision of Primary Care and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5893-280X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We aim to incorporate physician insights into the development of a performance dashboard based on a novel patient experience survey system at a large academic health system. A multidisciplinary team of physicians, researchers, and designers met regularly to develop the dashboard informed by Clinical Performance Feedback Intervention Theory. Semistructured qualitative interviews with frontline physicians underwent combined inductive-deductive thematic analysis to inform dashboard improvements. A total of 20 interviews were conducted April-July 2023 with 9 neurologists and 6 primary care physicians in 2 phases. Physician preferences converged along design, content, and administration features, which were incorporated into the dashboard and accepted by physicians during phase 2. Important themes included establishment of survey credibility, preference for qualitative over quantitative data, and associated incentive structure. Dashboard design required an intuitive data overview with features such as hover-over insights that allowed deeper exploration. Physicians valued patient comments over quantitative data, prompting further redesign of the dashboard to prioritize qualitative insights, contrasting with the national emphasis on quantitative benchmarks.

Indexed as

coachingpatient experienceperformance feedbackphysician wellbeingquality improvement

Identifiers

PMID40351736
PMCPMC12064888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.