ArticleJournal of patient experience2025
Towards a Novel Patient Experience Survey System: Incorporating Physician Perspectives into Performance Feedback Dashboard Design.
Article in Journal of patient experience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We aim to incorporate physician insights into the development of a performance dashboard based on a novel patient experience survey system at a large academic health system. A multidisciplinary team of physicians, researchers, and designers met regularly to develop the dashboard informed by Clinical Performance Feedback Intervention Theory. Semistructured qualitative interviews with frontline physicians underwent combined inductive-deductive thematic analysis to inform dashboard improvements. A total of 20 interviews were conducted April-July 2023 with 9 neurologists and 6 primary care physicians in 2 phases. Physician preferences converged along design, content, and administration features, which were incorporated into the dashboard and accepted by physicians during phase 2. Important themes included establishment of survey credibility, preference for qualitative over quantitative data, and associated incentive structure. Dashboard design required an intuitive data overview with features such as hover-over insights that allowed deeper exploration. Physicians valued patient comments over quantitative data, prompting further redesign of the dashboard to prioritize qualitative insights, contrasting with the national emphasis on quantitative benchmarks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.