SynthesisReviews in cardiovascular medicine2025
Predictive Effect of GDF-15 on Adverse Outcomes After Cardiovascular Interventions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Growth differentiation factor 15 level changes in the early and late periods after radiofrequency and pulsed field catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the predictive effect of Growth Differentiation Factor-15 (GDF-15) on adverse outcomes in patients undergoing cardiovascular interventions. Method: A comprehensive literature search was performed across PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases. The meta-analysis used hazard ratios (HR) and odds ratios (OR) to compare outcomes such as all-cause mortality, cardiovascular death, postoperative atrial fibrillation (AF), acute kidney injury (AKI), and spontaneous myocardial infarction (MI) between high GDF-15 levels and control groups. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on study design and GDF-15 cutoff levels. Publication bias was evaluated using funnel plot and Egger's test. Results: A total of 13 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The study revealed a significant association between elevated GDF-15 levels and increased all-cause mortality. Subgroup analysis showed a significant association in retrospective studies but not in prospective studies. Higher GDF-15 cutoff levels (>2 ng/mL) were more strongly associated with increased mortality than lower cutoff levels (≤2 ng/mL). Elevated GDF-15 levels were found to be significantly associated with increased risks of cardiovascular death, AKI, and spontaneous MI. No significant difference was observed in the incidence of postoperative AF. The overall adverse outcomes analysis showed no significant difference. Subgroup analyses suggested significant associations primarily observed in studies with higher GDF-15 cutoffs. Conclusion: Elevated GDF-15 levels are associated with increased risks of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular death, AKI, and spontaneous MI in patients undergoing cardiovascular interventions. Due to the heterogeneity of the studies, including variations in surgical techniques, the conclusions should be interpreted with caution. The PROSPERO Registration: CRD42024582279, https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42024582279.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.