ArticleReviews in cardiovascular medicine2025
Development and Validation of a Novel Nomogram Risk Prediction Model for In-Hospital Death Following Extended Aortic Arch Repair for Acute Type A Aortic Dissection.
Article in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine learning approaches for risk prediction in aortic dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- An AI-driven machine learning approach identifies risk factors associated with 30-day mortality following total aortic arch replacement combined with stent elephant implantation.Annals of medicine · 2025Article
- Applications of Artificial Intelligence as a Prognostic Tool in the Management of Acute Aortic Syndrome and Aneurysm: A Comprehensive Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Extended aortic arch repair (EAR) is increasingly adopted for treating acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD). However, existing prediction models may not be suitable for assessing the in-hospital death risk in ATAAD patients undergoing EAR. This study aims to develop a comprehensive risk prediction model for in-hospital death following EAR based on patient's preoperative status and surgical data, which may contribute to identification of high-risk individuals and improve outcomes following EAR. Methods: We reviewed clinical records of consecutive adult ATAAD patients undergoing EAR at our institute between January 2015 and December 2022. Utilizing data from 925 ATAAD patients undergoing EAR, we employed multivariable logistic regression and machine learning techniques, respectively, to develop nomograms for in-hospital mortality. Employed machine learning techniques included simple decision tree, random forest (RF), eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), and support vector machine (SVM). Results: The nomogram based on SVM outperformed others, achieving a mean area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) of 0.842 on training dataset and a mean AUC of 0.782 on testing dataset, accompanied by a Brier score of 0.058. Key risk factors included cerebral malperfusion, mesenteric malperfusion, preoperative critical station, Marfan syndrome, platelet count, D-dimer, coronary artery bypass grafting, and cardiopulmonary bypass time. A web-based application was developed for clinical use. Conclusions: We develop a novel nomogram risk prediction model based on SVM algorithm for in-hospital death following extended aortic arch repair for ATAAD with good discrimination and accuracy. Clinical Trial Registration: Registration number ChiCTR2200066414, https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=187074.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.